教學助理

教學助理(Teaching Assistant):許依凡(Hsu, I-Fan)

2012年3月29日 星期四

Moderation In Obesity


98121314 Hannah Ho

As more people getting fatter and fatter, “Is a person’s weight his or her own business?” asked Peter Singer, Professor of Bioethics at Princeton, in an article titled “Weigh more, pay more.”  His answer is “No.” Obesity is now an ethical issue, because an increase in weight by some imposes costs on others. Peter Singer invoked data of the research and proposal of Tony Webber, a former chief economist for the Australian airline Qantas to illustrate how obesity vastly increases the cost of flight and exacerbates global worming. Signer further pointed out obesity raises cost in public transportation, medical facilities, and additional health care which results in more costs for taxpayers and policyholders. Obesity also results in a tremendous productivity loss. Obesity is second only to tobacco use as the leading cause of preventable death. All these fact justify Signer’s assertion that public policies shall discourage weigh gain, such as taxing foods that are disproportionately implicated in obesity.

Some people may argue for human rights and insist that a person’s weight is his or her own business. However, as the private issue concerned public issues, it is no longer a private one. Though many obese people cannot help being overweight–they just have a different metabolism from the rest of us for genetic or acquired factors, more obesity is resulted from intemperate food intake and lack of physical exercise. That is, this kind of obesity resulted from intentionally wrong behaviors. Most of these obese people acknowledge that they should control their body weight, but their reason give way to their appetite which is driven by their spirit.

Apparently, most obese people can no longer be a good master of their own body. On the contrary, they become slavery of their appetite and spirit. Since one has lost the principle and ability of self-discipline in body weight control, governments should intervene and correct the out of control obesity issue to help their people, society, country, most of all, the earth.

Reference
Singer, Peter. “Weigh More, Pay more,” Project Syndicate. March 12, 2012. web: March 28, 2012.
〈肥胖正在傷害地球〉 ,《商業周刊》1270期2012.3. pp. 28-30.
               

4 則留言:

  1. 這個主題和主張正可用於人權課的討論,其實台灣全民健保制度的全民強制投保設計,就已經把國民健康既當成權利,也是義務。因此,吸菸、肥胖、吃檳榔等都被視為國民健康三大敵人,政府、社團和媒體除了公衛宣導,還透過指導正確生活方式的意識規訓,建立正常(文明、進步)╱病態(未開化、落後)的區分。政府權力管治國民健康,也正當地介入慾望的管理、飲食起居和評比國民。
    或許在國民健康、環保救地球的理由之下,自由不僅所剩無幾,其內容大概要全面置換。

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 在公民社會中,讓渡個人自由,以獲得整體社會對其生命,財產的保護,本是天經地義的事。但是當政府需要介入的層面和層級愈加擴大和升高,監管愈加緊密時,普世人類的生活終將趨向一致:如赫須黎的小說 “美麗新世界”描述的,只有服從的自由,暗中不服從的自由,及自殺的自由。

      刪除
  2. 同學你好 ^^

    肥胖的問題確實不僅是個人,也影響到整體國家的成本...
    對於政府能對肥胖者進行管制、懲罰等相關政策我也持贊同意見,但比起此問題來說,我如果從貧富的面向切入來探討或許有截然不同的觀點

    在現今社會中,肥胖或許已不是營養過剩的有錢象徵或不知節制的壞習慣
    而是對貧窮者的另一種懲罰
    舉例而言:吃粗飽的一餐或許只要50元不到便能達到,但隨意觀看生機飲食店,連一包鹽就要290元,而一杯"精力湯、明日葉"動輒100元
    試問窮人真的有權選擇吃較好食物的權力嗎?
    又,經濟上許可的人,對於自己開始肥胖的身軀可去健身房,也可請私人教練
    更甚者去做專人SPA、醫療美容(這些隨便一堂課都要一千起跳)

    窮人沒有經濟能力、沒有時間(窮人賺錢慢)去做體型上的改變,更甚者不知相關的健康知識
    他們或許連煩惱下一餐都來不及....

    如果政策無法改變貧富過大的差距,又對肥胖者進行相關管制,是否對貧窮者進行多一層的剝削


    (註:因為本人曾當過健身房教練,深深思考過,我幫助減肥成功的人是哪些,又有很多真的需要幫忙的人,卻被社會排擠在外)

    提供自身的觀察和大家分享 :))

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 婷心妳好
      〈肥胖正在傷害地球〉作者也認同妳的觀點-速食消費群的趨向。(麥當勞之類的速食在美國)
      至於“對於政府能對肥胖者進行管制、懲罰等相關政策我也持贊同意見” 可能要再說明一下,並不是懲罰肥胖者,而是政策介入,管制因“製造”肥胖獲利的相關行業(譬如提高其稅收)。作者在文中舉了ㄧ個實例,說明航空公司在超重收費上擬作調整的原因。作者搭機時,見到一位瘦小姐帶了超重行李40Kg須多繳費,但一位足足比她多50Kg 以上的男士卻不用繳。超重會造成燃油成本及地球接受廢氣傷害的成本,所以加收人體的超重費用,不是懲罰,是反映成本。

      鏘鏘

      刪除